5 Apr
2010
5 Apr
'10
7:25 p.m.
I've been doing my best to ignore this thread, but it's beginning to get to me ... The de Rham curve is defined in terms of a pair of contracting maps and binary expansion. Presumably k maps and expansion to base k would work in just the same way --- with even more mind-boggling options? WFL On 4/6/10, Gareth McCaughan <gareth.mccaughan@pobox.com> wrote:
On Monday 05 April 2010 20:23:40 Mike Stay wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski's_question_mark_function
... leading to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Rham_curve which nicely answers Allan's remark about fractals.
--
g
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun