September 2013 - mathfun@mailman.xmission.com

[math-fun] Fwd: harder 7x7x7?
by Bill Gosper 03 Jun '15

03 Jun '15

I sent this to the kids last week. Neil 3D printed two 2x3x1s and searched manually, with Burrtools, and with a too-slow Mathematica program, and was unable to find a solution in which the new pieces relaxed the constraints on the other key pieces. (Not firm) conclusion: Replacing the three 2x2x1s by two 2x3x1s makes the puzzle harder (for anyone who doesn't already know how to solve it). --rwg But replacing the the 2x2x2 and 2x2x1 by two 2x3x1s makes Conway's 5x5x5 *much* easier.http://gosper.org/7%5E3leg.pdf ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bill Gosper <billgosper(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM To: Neil Bickford <techie314(a)gmail.com> Cc: Julian Ziegler Hunts <julianj.zh(a)gmail.com>, Jon Ziegler < jonathan.zh(a)gmail.com>, Corey Ziegler Hunts <corwin.zh(a)gmail.com>, Michael Beeler <mikebeeler(a)verizon.net>, rcs(a)xmission.com, stan(a)isaacs.com Working Stan [Isaac]'s copy at the Gardner thing, I was reminded that it always seems easy to permute a solution so that the three 2x2x1s form a 2x2x3. The puzzle might be harder if we force this configuration by replacing the 2x2x1s with two 2x3x1s (e.g. by truncating two spare 2x4x1s), assuming that the temptation to use a 2x3x1 singly in the solution proves both frequent and fatal. If nonfatal, it would probably make the puzzle way too easy. --Bill

7 10

[math-fun] What is elliptic K and E closed form?
by Bill Gosper 25 May '15

25 May '15

I think the answer has changed in the last 50 yrs. A query from constantologist Steve Finch revived my interest in whether special value identities like EllipticK[(1 + Sqrt[2])^4] == ((1/4 - I/2)π^(3/2))/ ((2 + Sqrt[2]) Gamma[3/4]^2) and EllipticK[8 2^(1/4) (-1 + Sqrt[2])^3* E^(I ArcTan[(3 (3 + Sqrt[2]))/(4 2^(1/4))])] == (I (1 + Sqrt[2]) E^(-2 I ArcCot[2^(1/4)]) π^(3/2))/ (4 Sqrt[2] Gamma[3/4]^2) are already known, and where one might find tables much more extensive than, e.g., http://functions.wolfram.com/EllipticIntegrals/EllipticK/03/01/ or http://dlmf.nist.gov/19.6 . DLMF says "Exact values of K(k) and E(k) for various special values of k are given in Byrd and Friedman (1971, 111.10 and 111.11)" (1st English edition, 1954) Neil and his Mom were kind enough to fetch me this comprehensive (*Handbook* of *Elliptic* Integrals for Engineers and Physicists<http://www.amazon.com/Handbook-Elliptic-Integrals-Engineers-Physicists/dp/B…>), and to my surprise and disappointment, there was not a single identity of the above form, i.e. algebraics times Gammas(rationals). How could this be? My guess: In the 1950s K and E were considered closed forms while Gamma was not! It makes sense: K and E are of lower computational complexity. We Funsters once concluded that Gamma[k/24] was rapidly computable thanks to elliptic K identities. But now, in papers like "EVALUATION OF COMPLETE ELLIPTIC INTEGRALS OF THE FIRST KIND AT SINGULAR MODULI" (people.math.carleton.ca/~*williams*/papers/*pdf*/*299*.*pdf*) "evaluation" means "determin[ation] explicitly in terms of Gamma values". Which is what I always thought. See, e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_integral#Special_values --rwg

2 1

Re: [math-fun] parametrizing the Koch snowflake curve
by Bill Gosper 24 Apr '15

24 Apr '15

Fourier epicycles thru nth: (d16) sum(((product((1 - (( - 1)^j * tan(((%pi * (2 * k + (1/3)))/(2^j)))/(sqrt(3)))),j,1,inf)) * (%e)^(%i * (6 * k + 1) * t)/((2 * k + (1/3))^2)),k, - n,n) See http://www.tweedledum.com/rwg/cog.htm Also http://gosper.org/fst.dvi Pix: http://gosper.org/fst1.png ,http://gosper.org/fst2.png , http://gosper.org/fst3.png ,http://gosper.org/fst4.png . (For parametric, take Re and Im.) Rich's base 4 recursion loops for rational arg. Find the fixed point of the pending stack ops to simulate infinite recursion, and get an exact val on the curve. Equate to this Fourier series for a *non-obvious* identity. --rwg > If you view the starting triangle as running from 0 to 3, > and write the fraction base 4, you can use the > fraction digits to select which part of the (sub)edge > you are on. The orientation of the edge can be calculated > from the 1s and 2s of the high order portion of the fraction, > and that should give a somewhat kludgy sum for the (x,y) > coordinates of the image point. > RWG likely has some nice FFT clock sum expression. > > Rich > > > -----Original Message----- > From: math-fun-bounces(a)mailman.xmission.com [mailto: math-fun-bounces(a)mailman.xmission.com] On > Behalf Of N. J. A. Sloane > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:43 PM > To: math-fun(a)mailman.xmission.com > Cc: njas(a)research.att.com > Subject: Re: [math-fun] parametrizing the Koch snowflake curve > > Jim Propp asked: > >> Does anyone (Bill Gosper, maybe?) know an explicit parametrization > of the Koch snowflake curve? > > The Cantor set consists of the points 0 <= x <= 1 which have a base 3 "decimal" expansion that > does not contain a 1. Is there a similar characterization of the Koch snowflake? > > Neil Sloane > >

2 1

[math-fun] That fractal pentagram again
by Bill Gosper 09 Apr '15

09 Apr '15

For some pictorial. mildly trick questions: http://gosper.org/foupent.pdf (1.6M) --rwg

1 4

[math-fun] Alan Adler, of Aerobie fame,
by Bill Gosper 14 Sep '14

14 Sep '14

finds Euler's product over primes for zeta(s) somewhat magical, and wonders if we funsters know other really neat sums or products involving primes. Hence yesterday's "Minor twist". Otherwise, all I could remember was our Valentine's Day 2011 discussion of "Euler's crazy pi product". --rwg

5 11

[math-fun] why can a line of slope 10^n determine n decimal digits of π?
by Gary Antonick 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

Just noticed this yesterday and can't figure out why it works. Draw a circle with radius 1 around 0,0. Draw a line with slope -10 that hits the circle at 1,0. This line will also hit the circle again and make a little arc. The length of the arc will be about 1/31 the perimeter of the circle. Now try again with a line of slope -100. The line will create an arc 1/314 of the circle. Starting to look a bit like pi. Am wondering why this is. In case I made a mistake here's what I'm trying to describe.. if the circle were a clock the first line would cut an arc from 15 minutes (3:00) to almost the 13 minute mark.

4 7

Re: [math-fun] Iridium & Indium (inside future analogue of light bulbs?)
by Henry Baker 13 May '14

13 May '14

The good news is that "quantum dots" don't depend upon normal valence electron energy levels in order to achieve their properties. Their properties are primarily a result of their size & configuration, which is in the 5-20 nm range -- almost achievable in the next 1-2 generations of lithography. So many of the needs for exotic materials with very specific bandgaps will be replaced by these engineered quantum dots. --- It was my impression that most, if not all, iridium comes from outer space; there is very little indigenous iridium on the Earth's surface. There may be a lot in the Earth's core, but it's going to be a little difficult to mine it from there. At 04:42 PM 12/4/2012, Warren Smith wrote: >Iridium is 40x rarer than gold and total world production is only >about 10 tons annually. > >Indium is also pretty rare, but not as rare: 1000 ton annual production. >So I think if iridium is a substantial component of solid plastic >lighting source then that will not be a useful technology for Average >Joe Consumer. I would think >you'd want ingredients common enough for million-ton production. >If they can remove the need for Iridium and other rare elements, the >general concept sounds excellent as a future lighting source. > >-- >Warren D. Smith >http://RangeVoting.org <-- add your endorsement (by clicking >"endorse" as 1st step)

10 15

Re: [math-fun] Exact Cover Solver
by Adam P. Goucher 23 Oct '13

23 Oct '13

In polynomial time? I think I have a reduction of 3-SAT to an exact cover problem, so this would be *really* useful. Sincerely, Adam P. Goucher http://cp4space.wordpress.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: quad > Sent: 07/29/13 02:18 PM > To: math-fun > Subject: [math-fun] Exact Cover Solver > > Hello: > > I just wanted to announce that I wrote a program to find the exact > cover of a set S = {0, ..., n-1}. It uses Knuth's Algorithm X with > his Dancing Links strategy. > > The code is here in Lisp: https://bitbucket.org/tarballs_are_good/dancing-links > > Example: Given the sets > > A = {0, 3, 6} > B = {0, 3} > C = {3, 4, 6} > D = {2, 4, 5} > E = {1, 2, 5, 6} > F = {1, 6}, > > find all disjoint unions of the above that equals S. > > This is an exact cover problem for n = 7. Input into the program is easy: > > > (exact-cover 7 '((0 3 6) ; A > (0 3) ; B > (3 4 6) ; C > (2 4 5) ; D > (1 2 5 6) ; E > (1 6))) ; F > > It will think, and spit out > > Solution #1 at depth 3: > 6 1 > 5 2 4 > 3 0 > > and then return the total number of solutions found (1) and the total > number of "positions" checked (5). Note that the solution above > corresponds to F, D, and B respectively, just the elements were > permuted. Note that they are indeed disjoint and their union is S. > > > The program still needs a little polishing, but may be useful to some > people who want to solve pentomino or n-omino packing, sudokus, or > whatever. If anyone is interested in having it as a stand-alone binary > that takes a file as input, let me know, and I can probably > accommodate. :) > > Cheers, > > Robert Smith > > _______________________________________________ > math-fun mailing list > math-fun(a)mailman.xmission.com > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun

4 5

[math-fun] how not to handle equations in lectures
by Warren D Smith 22 Oct '13

22 Oct '13

When I give a lecture, if I write an equation, I explain all the meanings of the letters inside it, and what it says. If Nima Arkani-Hamed flashes an equation on screen, he never (?) defines the letters inside it, never explains what it says, and just sort of waves his hand at it, kind of as though pointing out a passing airplane, then moves on. Also, he never writes a theorem statement, nor even an explicit "CLAIM: xxxx." I would say "never" except maybe sometimes he does give a very partial stab at it for a small subset of equations, so perhaps we should give him partial credit on a few equations. I don't understand how one can adopt this lecture style, except as a joke. If other physicists imitate him in this respect (since he's a great $3M prize winner) it would be a disaster. just my opinion...

5 16

[math-fun] Works of A.A. Karatstuba
by Simon Plouffe 18 Oct '13

18 Oct '13

Hello, I received this news about the works of A.A. Karatsuba, http://link.springer.com/journal/11501/276/1/page/1 2) the second volume: http://link.springer.com/journal/11501/280/2/suppl/page/1 with the paper :"Scientific achievements of Anatolii Alekseevich Karatsuba" http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0081543813030012 3) the third volume: http://link.springer.com/journal/11501/282/1/suppl/page/1 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0081543813070018 This is all interesting, but well they ask about 35 euros for each article, it sums up to about 1400 euros, nearly 2000 dollars for the collected works of about 600 pages. These guys at Springer are very greedy. I hope someone will find a way to gather all of these precious papers and distribute them for free. In Russia, 35 euros for 1 article is quite an amount of money for knowledge, this is a shame. Even if the articles are excellent this is way too much. Best regards, Simon Plouffe

3 2