Re: [Kraftwerk] A message from Wolfgang Fluer
Hey fellow Kraftwerk fans, Yesterday was some sorta rollercoaster ride on this here list, oh my! Many issues came up that I, as a moderator on two other music groups, have never had to face, thank god! :-) What has made me a little nervous is the fact that although it seems that this list is a private entity and that it takes place in emails or a digest format, it is in fact, very public. Anyone can go to the xmission website and read the digests. I'm dismayed that Wolfgang's email address was shared with basically the world, and I'm thinking without his knowledge or consent. I want to learn all about Kraftwerk and to celebrate their music with other fans, but in my opinion, this list desperately needs the moderator to protect the interests of the group, and the privacy of its members, or at the very least, those people whose email addresses are displayed without their knowledge or consent. Just my two cents, that's all. pat _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
What has made me a little nervous is the fact that although it seems that this list is a private entity and that it takes place in emails or a digest format, it is in fact, very public. Anyone can go to the xmission website and read the digests. I'm dismayed that Wolfgang's email address was shared with basically the world, and I'm thinking without his knowledge or consent.
Well, though I don't approve of posting private e-mail to the list without consent, that e-mail address has been mentioned here before -- back before Dirk was even on the list. It was also posted on amazon.com for a while, by Wolfgang himself! So it's not exactly top-secret...
A "Flur" (without umlaut) is a "meadow".
Hilarious note: a "Flurhueter" is a "forester", not Mr. Huetter who takes care of Mr. Fluer. Unless in a Dominas sense, maybe.
Perhaps I "take care of" the Flur, eh? -Eric Gartner
A few months ago, there was some discussion on the list concerning the 2001 Polar Price ceremony in Stockholm, where Karl Bartos spoke the laudatio for Karlheinz Stockhausen (The other award winners were Bob Moog -see below- and Burt Bacharach). Someone asked whether Stockhausen even knew Kraftwerk, as he did not recognize "Autobahn" in the first place. Well, now some quite interesting first hand information has appeared on the Stockhausen website (the text was written by Suzanne Stephens, a longtime collaborator of Stockhausen): ... As we ate, Karl Bartos of the group Kraftwerk came over to our table to introduce himself and to say that he had been asked to speak StockhausenÂs laudatio during the awards ceremony, and that he was honoured to do so. As many of you know, Kraftwerk is another one of the many groups who says that they were greatly influenced by the music of Stockhausen. Therefore, it is a very fitting choice to have asked him. ... After the interview we went back to the hotel to get ready for dinner with the German ambassador and his wife at the German Embassy in Stockholm. (...) The German ambassador in Stockholm often has the occasion to entertain German nobel prize winners, but this was the first time that a German had been awarded the Polar Music Prize. Also present were Stuart Ward, manager of the Polar Music Prize, Ake Holmquist, General Secretary of the Royal Swedish Academy of Music, all of the musicians who were performing StockhausenÂs works that weekend, Karl Bartos and his wife,and several other guests (...) ... The performance of GESANG DER JÃNGLINGE went perfectly and then Karl Bartos walked onto the stage to read the laudatio. He first briefly spoke to Stockhausen in German, saying that he felt very honoured to be present on this occasion and that he extended his own personal warm congratulations for the well-deserved prize which Stockhausen was now being awarded. Then he spoke the official laudatio: ÂEver since his first compositions in the 1950s, Karlheinz Stockhausen, from Germany, has stood at the forefront of musical development. While no contemporary composer has generated as much heated discussion as he does, no one can deny StockhausenÂs importance and pivotal role. StockhausenÂs work, GESANG DER JÃNGLINGE, composed in 1956, first brought electronic music to the public eye and is still considered to be one of the masterpieces of its kind. At the start of the 1960s, Stockhausen turned his interest toward live electronics. At the same time, he began exhibiting an interest in oriental philosopy and religion and became a pioneer of world music and the meditative form. Since 1977, he has been working on his soon to be completed LICHT-opera, the greatest musical endeavor since WagnerÂs ring. Karlheinz Stockhausen is being awarded the Polar Music Prize for 2001 for a career as a composer that has been characterized by impeccable integrity and never-ceasing creativity, and for having stood at the forefront of musical development for fifty years. Then HM King Carl XVI Gustaf walked onto the stage, presented Stockhausen with the citation, and shook his hand. ... Following this, Stockhausen gave an interview with the Swedish national television for the Culture News during which he was asked, among other things, how he felt about the fact that many of the young generation of techno musicians claim that StockhausenÂs music greatly influenced their musical ideas. He said that he is pleased that the younger generation is finally beginning to spend time experimenting with sound in studios, and that he considered it a compliment that they were familiar with, and respected his work. Asked in detail about the music of some of the groups, he said he was not well informed, but that young musicians regularly send him recordings of their work and he often listens to them and sends them his comments. In one of the many interviews which he had given per telephone and in person in connection with the Polar Music Prize prior to coming to Stockholm, he had been asked about the fact that he has always had a major influence on progressive pop music, such as that of the Beatles, Can, and Kraftwerk, and he was asked how he thought his music had influenced them. He couldnÂt answer that question, but upon hearing an excerpt played over earphones and asked if he knew what group it was, he guessed correctly when he heard the words Autobahn Autobahn Autobahn ... We just had time to deposit our suitcases in the rooms before we walked over to the nearby Royal Swedish Academy of Music where the press conference was to take place. Before it began, Stockhausen and Robert Moog had a chance to briefly chat. During the activities of the weekend they never had time to Âtalk shopÂ, but they agreed to keep in touch because, Stockhausen is very much interested in MoogÂs new analogue synthesizers, which allow better individual sound synthesis than the commercial digital synthesizers do. ... It seemed as if they could have gone on talking with each other forever, but finally had to stop for questions from the audience. Moog and Stockhausen agreed to keep in touch to discuss StockhausenÂs many complaints about the synthesizers presently on the market and MoogÂs development of a new analogue synthesizer which could quiet allot of those complaints. I hope this was interesting to read for some people on the list. For me, it was.
Markus Berzborn <markus.berzborn@t-online.de> wrote:
(the text was written by Suzanne Stephens, a longtime collaborator of Stockhausen):
[...]
As many of you know, Kraftwerk is another one of the many groups who says that they were greatly influenced by the music of Stockhausen.
Have they ever actually said that they were? (Genuine question!).
It seemed as if they could have gone on talking with each other forever, but finally had to stop for questions from the audience. Moog and Stockhausen agreed to keep in touch to discuss Stockhausen's many complaints about the synthesizers presently on the market and Moog's development of a new analogue synthesizer which could quiet allot of those complaints.
Phat filters? :-D K PS
I hope this was interesting to read for some people on the list. For me, it was.
Yes, thanks!
[...]
As many of you know, Kraftwerk is another one of the many groups who says that they were greatly influenced by the music of Stockhausen.
Have they ever actually said that they were? (Genuine question!).
I don't think so, but I just wanted to pass on the text without personal comments. What I know for sure is that Irmin Schmidt and Holger Czukay from Can were students of Stockhausen in the sixties. But tell Klaus Schulze that he is in any way influenced by Stockhausen (as some interviewers did) and he will tell you that this is plain nonsense. But anyway, Stockhausen has never been very interested in pop music, although recently some journalist had the silly idea to send him some recordings by techno artists to ask him what advice he could give to his "younger colleagues". As you would expect, the advice was always something like: "Stop using these regular rhythms" and "Stop using these conventional major/minor harmonies", which of course for pop musicians comes close to saying: "Stop making music altogether"!
It seemed as if they could have gone on talking with each other forever, but finally had to stop for questions from the audience. Moog and Stockhausen agreed to keep in touch to discuss Stockhausen's many complaints about the synthesizers presently on the market and Moog's development of a new analogue synthesizer which could quiet allot of those complaints.
Phat filters? :-D
I read an interview with Stockhausen on this topic some years ago. What he seems to be primarily looking for in a synthesizer is not the "sound" as such but the possibilities to edit given sounds as radically as possible and to "compose" sounds from scratch. This is why he hates the ROMplers that became popular in the 90s, while he likes devices like the early DX models and sophisticated analogue synthesizers. I'm quite sure, though, that he is not very well informed about the current market situation, as there are now some instruments which come close to his conceptions. OK, as this is the Kraftwerk list, I don't want to go into further details.
Thanks to Lord Ruthen and OJ for an interesting debate. Yes, Stockhausen has said some very weird things over the years, and the hero-worship he encounters might cloud his judgement too sometimes? But he has worked damn hard for that reputation. Markus Berzborn <markus.berzborn@t-online.de> wrote:
[...]
As many of you know, Kraftwerk is another one of the many groups who says that they were greatly influenced by the music of Stockhausen.
Have they ever actually said that they were? (Genuine question!).
I don't think so
As I thought. :-) (Karl B's comments indicate a high regard for Stockhausen's work, but, with no disrespect, comments at awards ceremonies prove little, eh? :-) ).
but I just wanted to pass on the text without personal comments.
Sure. But isn't it tiresome how the same old hearsay gets repeated by the mass media?! (More at http://web.bham.ac.uk/busbykg/kraftwerk/FAQ/related- projects.html#stockhausen ;-) )
he likes devices like the early DX models
He used some heavily Frequency Modulated "synthetic" sounds on his recent soundtrack for the Brothers Quay film 'In Absentia' (http:// www.zeitgeistfilms.com/current/quays/absentia.html), so I guess that may have been partly down to a DX synth. Enrique Correa <ENRIQUEC@heraeusmtd.com> wrote:
Karlheinz Stockhausen must be one of must boring musicians (if we can call him that) on this planet. Yeah, he received some fancy prizes and stuff like that, but I dare any of you to listen to any of his recordings non stop. Chances are you'll feel tempted to press forward a few times and then the stop / eject button so you can then take it straight back to that second hand store you got it from and trade it for something a bit more melodic (just about anything in store will do). What I've heard from him is nothing but noise crap,
etc etc Enqrique, no personal offence intended, but you really need to try to educate yourself about the possibilities of expression via sound before you start ranting like that! Lack of "melody" is not the same as noise, or lack of meaning. Your comments are akin to someone wandering into an art gallery and saying that Picasso couldn't draw circles properly, Dali's scenarios were unrealistic and Rueben's women need to go on a diet. And then holding up pictures of clowns, crying boys and wild horses as superior, because they are nicer.
sort of what Aphex Twin and Autechre do from time to time,
Learn to really _listen_. You can teach yourself, if you have the will and patience. But you have to start from the position that you are willing to learn. There are major rewards, I think, so don't miss out! ;-)
with the only difference that Aphex and Autechre did in fact recorded several ear candy tunes which I love deeply.
"Ear candy"? Streuth, settle down with a nice Bing Crosby LP, why don't you! :-D (Just kidding - I think!). Erik Jälevik <erik@tinyonline.co.uk> wrote:
BTW, Varese's "Poème electronique" is a very fine piece of classical electronica.
That makes it sound very cheap! But it is a fine piece of electronic music, and also a fun one, which is not too alienating for "the general public" (although over 4 decades later, classical music venues still find it too strange for them, in my experience). Oh Jay <oh_jay@freenet.de> wrote:
"music is organized noise !!!" ;-)
Ralf's corruption of Varese's definition "music is organised sound"!
the next two albums ( "autobahn" & "radio-activity" ) to discover their concept status , as both - "autobahn" & "radio-activity" - still included lots of "noisy" trax that simply can't be described as conventional songs , because they jus' lack such a structure !!!
They "lack" such a structure in the same way that a frog lacks wings!
erm ... please excuse me , but what the heck is "administrivia" ??? *puzzled_look* :-o surely NOT a "normal" english word , eh !? :-o
Like "electronica", it's Newspeak. ;-) Kevin
participants (4)
-
Eric Gartner -
Kevin Busby -
markus.berzborn@t-online.de -
Pat Slade