From: Soleil Lapierre <lapierrs@cuug.ab.ca>
Please be careful with your attributions, OJ. I'm not the one who wrote that.
INDEED_!!! >:-O i'm sorry , as i've realized this jus' after i've already send out my message to the list that it was originally written by "mr. efofex" ( ;-) & only quoted again in one of your replies !!! :-o anyway ... it would be nice , if "mr. efofex" could edit his replies a lil' more clearly & indicate to whom he's actually replyin' & also leave a space between his reply & the quoted text above his reply then !!! [ ... ]
Just gotta have the last word, eh? :)
well ... i could accuse u of the same then !!! *BWG* ;-)))
You're a fine one to talk about bias after all that flamage surrounding the list switchover.
HUH_??? >:-O fyi : the list switchover was simply necessary , as the ol' majordomo list had some major malfunctions & some messages never appeared on it , as we all hopefully remember !? so what the heck are u talkin' about in this case , mr. lapierre ??? *jus'_curious* how can u say that i'm biased in that case ... anyway ??? *puzzled_look*
IYHO only. In the first place, my opinions were not deliberately inflammatory. It was quite a while later that I finally remembered that mailing lists tend to have more sensitive people than I'm used to, and apologized. In the second place, my intent was not to annoy people but to express my annoyance with what I saw as an unreasonably biased viewpoint.
well ... what u see as "an unreasonably biased viewpoint" is A_PERFECTLY_REASONABLE_&_UNBIASED_VIEWPOINT ... not only imho ... as the discussion here has proven very effectively , but U_ALONE still seem to be way too stubborn to admit that u were simply WRONG with what u've assumed & have presented NO_REAL_ARGUMENTS_AT_ALL here & therefore only stoop down to a level of communication , where u can INSULT others , like me , with your pretty narrow-minded & - imho !!! - totally biased point of view , sorry !!! :-/
For future reference, here is the actual definition of "troll":
that's what U are : A_TROLL in this definition ... @ least for me !!! PERIOD_!!!
Send me some money and I will.
to buy a new stylus really ISN'T that expensive , mate !!! *G+* ;-)
Also don't forget some extra for a turntable, amp and speakers since I obviously must not have any decent instances of those either. Oh, and replacement records for my worn-out ones too. Based on what others have said, $3,000.00 should do for a start.
ha ... with the above UTTER_NONSENSE , u've jus' proven AGAIN , what kind of SILLY_TROLL u are then !!! *sigh* :-o ... & if u actually thought that it was somehow "funny" , then u've simply forgotten the smiley behind it !!! :-/
No, but I have from CDs.
*LOL* ;-))) do u actually know , what A_REAL_BASSLINE is then ??? *BWG* ;-))) i highly doubt so , as u obviously have only heard what u call A_BASS from such inferior 16 bit encoded standard cds , which is simply RIDICULOUS_!!! :-/
Bass is kind of irrelevant to your points about signal reproduction though, since low frequencies are much easier to record.
if this is indeed true ( which it simply ISN'T , of course !!! ) , then please tell me WHY vinyl can reproduce such low frequencies MUCH_BETTER than ANY inferior cd EVER could , eh ??? *slyest_grin_u_can_imagine* ;-))) now ... U'RE_TRAPPED , mate !!! *hehehe* ;-))) so the conclusion of it simply is that as vinyl can reproduce such frequencies much better than a cd can , cds are inferior as their frequency range is simply SMALLER than the one of a vinyl ( i. e. analog ) record !!! *slyest_grin_again* ;-))) case closed !!! u're dismissed ... finally !!!
More undefined terms.
are u man or machine then , mr. lapierre ??? *XLG* ;-)))
Anyway, I found this thread to be fun and informative.
yeah ... mostly thanx to "mr. efofex" & peo , as they were the ones , who've added some really interestin' & also TRUE_ARGUMENTS to this discussion , which U_DIDN'T_!!! *sigh* :-o
I learned a few things to be sure, and I hope others did too.
well ... what i've learned - especially from the debate with u !!! - is that it's rather pointless & fruitless to reply to such a biased & stubborn troll like u are !!! :-/
I still think CDs generally sound better though.
u are free to think / believe & also express this wherever u want , BUT ... you're NOT free to claim that u're right with what u assume , as u simply AREN'T right with it ... & are also NOT willin' to learn or to be convinced by some really good arguments , like they were presented here by "mr. efofex" or peo ... only for instance !!! *sigh* :-o p. s. : as i've written in one of my previous messages here , jus' ask ANY sound engineer about this matter & he'll tell u WHY analog ( vinyl ) is indeed still "better" than digital ( cd ) !!! *sly_grin* ;-) sorry , but my limited knowledge of the english language is sadly not enough to convince u of THE_PLAIN_FACTS_!!! *sigh* :-o case closed now ... @ least for me !!! however ... many greetinx , oh jay ;-) ~*~ jvr network program - july 2002 : http://mitglied.lycos.de/cybernetx/program.html ( incl. live stream via internet ) studio webcam - live : http://stream.ok-bremen.de/studio.html radio show & playlist archive : http://friends.schallreflektor.com/ohjay/alien_disco for more info , send your request(s) to : oh_jay@kraftwerk.nu ;-) *~\^/~*