Luca Dassi <kraftwerk@xeed.com> wrote:
I totally agree that sexual preferences are private matters even for famous people - but the simple fact that a picture of Wolfgang appeared in an homosexual magazine does not imply *anything* about his inclinations
Fluer wrote quite candidly about this in his autobiography. I got the impression that his curiosity about homosexuality was an outgrowth of narcissism. I don't mean that abusively. "Even the greatest stars find their face in the looking glass..."
reporting it can not be interpreted as a sign of "personal aversion".
No, and what's _this_, anyway?! http://www.elektropolis.de/ssb_kontakt1.htm :-D Oh Jay <oh_jay@freenet.de> wrote:
well ... i'm not sure , what u like to imply with that postin' here , dear dirk , but i actually don't even like the direction of it ... & certainly DON'T think that it was appropriate to post somethin' like this here !!! *sigh* :-o
Honestly, OJ, one of these days you are going to bite clean through your restraining harness!
oh jay , who jus' felt the overwhelmin' urge to "moderate" this topic ... somehow !!! :-o
"Good morning OJ!" "I don't know what's GOOD about it, mate!!! :-/ So why don't u jus' SHUT UP! *GRIM*" :-) K