hello everyone, i am a new list member unlurking for the first time. let me introduce myself. i am called xe, i am a conceptual and video artist currently living in southern california. starting sometime in the early nineties i was creating ambient environment projects, a pursuit that later folded itself into the local rave culture. after the inevitable burnout period and a rest i went back to my first love video/cinema and that is what i do now. i remember encountering 1987 when it came out in a little record store in the mission district of san francisco. as i imagine many of you were, i was blown away by the strong conceptual basis for thier work as well as the irresistible pop hooks in equal measure and avidly followed jim and bill's activities throughout the years. i have an observation that i'd like to ask you all regarding the recent skirmish about off-topic posting on the list. im hoping to get opinions from both camps. i know its off-topic in and of itself but im really curious. i belong to many lists mostly to do with music, film, and liturature. ive noticed that the literary and cinematic lists seem to have a relatively laissez faire attitude about off-topic posts as long as they started somewhere on-topic, but music lists are, as a rule, very intolerant off off-topic posts. the crux seems to be regarding 'content'. the writer people and the cinematic people seem to accept content as a valid topic for discussion and let it go on for some time within reason, whereas on music lists there seems to be a universal phobia about discussing content. for instance on the j.g. ballard list theres been an endless on/off discussion about class relations for some time now and to my knowledge ballard has never actually said he is writing about class but on the muslimgauze list any discussion about palestine gets its share of rabid instantaneous complaints despite the fact that byrn jones made it explicitly clear that ALL his music was about and inspired by the middle east and the plight of the palestinian people in particular. does anyone have any reasons why they think this is? as annoying as i find these these gigantic 9/11 posts on one level, i can see the relevance to this list in regards to content which, on another level, makes them entirely appropriate. thanks in advance for your ideas, and i do apologize to those that need it for the off topic first post. xe ===== ' the flowers in your hair to air-conditioned air children revoluting to apple computing...' - dr. calculus- __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 07:05:59PM -0700, xen on wrote:
hello everyone,
<snip> I think the big thing that needs to be taken into account here is that the recent posts in question are not Off Topic in the traditional sense, but trolling posts designed I assume to get people riled (conspiracy theories, insults abound, and of course the oh so standard on the internet "you're just too close minded to agree with me and my radical doom'n'gloom ideals, which are obviously right"). Anyway, it's one thing to post "Man, i got piss drunk last night and got in trouble with some blokes, does anyone know where to find cheap airline tickets to central Nunavut?" once, but completely different IMO to suddenly post word-for-word a list of tinfoil-hat crowd drivel... -- . \ ` ' / . ._` __^__ '_. Loki Ambridous von Esling [()=()] RELST8 - http://www.relst8.net /_____\ Justified
xen on wrote:
hello everyone,
i am a new list member unlurking for the first time.
Glad to have you aboard
i belong to many lists mostly to do with music, film, and liturature. ive noticed that the literary and cinematic lists seem to have a relatively laissez faire attitude about off-topic posts as long as they started somewhere on-topic, but music lists are, as a rule, very intolerant off off-topic posts.... does anyone have any reasons why they think this is?
This is probably because people generally like many different bands, and are therfore subscribed to several f band specific lists. It's easy to end up seeing the same off-topic discussion half a dozen times on different lists, which gets very irritating very quickly, especially when people are trolling and flamewars erupt. To make following the antics of dozens of bands a viable spare time proposition rather than a full-time job, the lists have to be fairly low traffic. People seem to be happiest with a wide assortment of tightly regulated on-topic lists and just one or two free-form discussions with like minded people, if everything goes free-form it gets unmanageable and repetitive. I'm reminded of the Underworld fan list, which was a very high traffic list, with maybe 100 posts a day. Many people missed the opportunity to see a secret comeback gig because the slightly subtle message about it simply got lost in the noise. The same think seems to (sadly) have happened here, with people missing out on the new blacksmoke track because they assumed the whole list was in flame-mode. - Andy_R
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 07:05:59PM -0700, xen on wrote:
but music lists are, as a rule, very intolerant off off-topic posts.
There's a difference between off-topic discussion and persistent spamming by a few people. I don't think anyone's discussed anything about the 911 posts. People have deleted them or responded angrily. That's not discussion. jon -- "Reason and free inquiry are the effectual agents against error. They are the natural enemies of error and error only." - Thomas Jefferson
participants (4)
-
Andy_R -
Jonathan Wakely -
Loki Ambrodious von Esling -
xen on