From what I have gathered, a MediaWiki page might be the best option. I would certainly support that. ..::// Thomas Touzimsky "[B]rewed with pride, yet with furious impatience and bad temper. We scream violent threats at this beer every day to make it brew faster." - Stuart Bruce (Serious Beer Project) Am 21.02.2012 um 13:36 schrieb Antti Lavio:
On 21.2.2012 14:20, tto@klf.de wrote:
The one thing I don't like about Discogs is that too many people try to force-choke their understanding of the guidelines down other members' throats and you end up with a KLF page that makes no sense.
In my dream world, we maybe would have a wiki-style approach where we could have everything we know, from discography to timeline and even the smallest details.
As some of the list members have been in direct contact with B&J and their friends, or have worked with pressing plants, studios and record stores associated to them, we have tons on stories that we all like to hear.
Also I personally, and pretty sure that others are too, am interested about history of certain release or bootleg. Where did it come from, where did it surface first an so on. And that's why I think wiki would most suitable for this. One example would be path Orbs Mummie Don't -> Eternal Space Cadets (Orbital Hum) -> 3AM, but there's much more.
Of course, this would demand quite heavy participation from "senior" members of the list, and I of course understand that this could be impossible.
But just my thoughts :)
-- anttil.
_______________________________________________ KLF mailing list KLF@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf Report list abuse to list-abuse at studio-nibble.com