No no no.
 
It's not the second coming.
 
Pete Smith IS thesoundof.mu!
 
 
My proof is here...
 
From
 
http://www.nic.mu/whois_view.jsp
 
I get this

Lookup Results

Domain Information
Domain thesoundof.mu
  http://thesoundof.mu/
  http://www.thesoundof.mu/
Created 22 May 2005
Expires 22 May 2007
Modified 11 Aug 2005
Status Active
Registrar Register.mu
Name Servers
  dns1.audioshots.net
  dns2.audioshots.net
  dns3.audioshots.net
 
Now the clue is in the dns settings - audioshots.net. Let's go look at that...
 
http://www.whois.net/whois.cgi2?d=audioshots.net

Registration Service Provided By: NameCheap.com
Contact: support@NameCheap.com
Visit: http://www.namecheap.com/

Domain name: audioshots.net

Registrant Contact:
   Audioshot
   Peter Smith (spe3d@tiscali.co.uk)
   +44.0000000000
   Fax: +1.5555555555
   The Mews
   East Hoathly
   Lewes, ST BN
   UK

Administrative Contact:
   Audioshot
   Peter Smith (spe3d@tiscali.co.uk)
   +44.0000000000
   Fax: +1.5555555555
   The Mews
   East Hoathly
   Lewes, ST BN
   UK

Technical Contact:
   Audioshot
   Peter Smith (spe3d@tiscali.co.uk)
   +44.0000000000
   Fax: +1.5555555555
   The Mews
   East Hoathly
   Lewes, ST BN
   UK

Billing Contact:
   Audioshot
   Peter Smith (spe3d@tiscali.co.uk)
   +44.0000000000
   Fax: +1.5555555555
   The Mews
   East Hoathly
   Lewes, ST BN
   UK
Are you still with me? Good. Further proof thesoundof.mu IS audioshots.net is to ping both from a command line. They live on the same server at dimenoc.com
 
Pinging audioshots.net [66.195.19.191] with 32 bytes of data:
 
Reply from 66.195.19.191: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.195.19.191: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.195.19.191: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.195.19.191: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=49
 
Ping statistics for 66.195.19.191:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 162ms, Maximum = 171ms, Average = 165ms
 
C:\ping thesoundof.mu
 
Pinging thesoundof.mu [66.195.19.191] with 32 bytes of data:
 
Reply from 66.195.19.191: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.195.19.191: bytes=32 time=168ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.195.19.191: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=49
Reply from 66.195.19.191: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=49
 
Ping statistics for 66.195.19.191:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 160ms, Maximum = 175ms, Average = 166ms
 

 
Fact Pete Smith IS thesoundof.mu
 
 
Thankyou
 
Andy
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Raymond Baal
To: All bound for Mu-Mu Land.
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [KLF] Are THEY behind thesoundof.mu?

Yes...it could ;-)

Thomas Touzimsky <thomas@klf.de> wrote:
> I just did a little research on "thesoundof.mu" and didn't find a
> whois entry. But I found a guy called "Markus" that has
> "thesoundof.mu" as his signature in a forum I found. Then I clicked
> his member name and got this info:

Could that be that strange forum someone stumbled across some weeks ago?
Damn, my memory is going...


..::// Thomas


_______________________________________________
KLF mailing list
KLF@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf
Report list abuse to list-abuse at studio-nibble.com


'Contained in a transcendental idealism, X$X is only readable through its representing other which hence becomes its symbol.' Michael K, 1997

To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.

_______________________________________________
KLF mailing list
KLF@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf
Report list abuse to list-abuse at studio-nibble.com

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.24/101 - Release Date: 13/09/2005