People often ask me these kinds of things as if I'm some kind of locked up mental patient emailing from a handheld I've somehow managed to smuggle into my secure accomodation at HMS Belsen and into my Prada straitjacket. Yes, I do have a lot of time on my hands. No need to rub it in. Ray 'Bored' Baal "Daniel (KLF Online)" <daniel@klf.de> wrote: Hi Raymond, great text! :) Do you have too much time to spend on such things? Although I have never found a better description for copyright anywhere else! Respect, man. Cheers, Dan Raymond wrote: When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write, if the copy is right. If however, your copy falls over, you must right your copy. If you write religious services you write rite, and have the right to copyright the rite you write. Very conservative people write right copy, and have the right to copyright the right copy they write. A right wing cleric would write right rite, and has the right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. His editor has the job of making the right rite copy right before the copyright can be right. Should Wright decide to write right rite, then Wright would write right rite, which Wright has the right to copyright. Duplicating that rite would copy Wright's right rite, and violate copyright, which Wright would have the right to right. Right? _______________________________________________ KLF mailing list KLF@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf Report list abuse to list-abuse at studio-nibble.com 'Contained in a transcendental idealism, X$X is only readable through its representing other which hence becomes its symbol.' Michael K, 1997 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com