I consider Coultier the right-wing equivilent of Moore.
your perception may be that she is the right-wing equivalent moore, but she really isn't
Me being republican has NOTHING to do with it.
so you say
BOTH are on the extreme ends of thier political perspective
how can one be on the extreme end of their own perspective? - perhaps you mean, extreme TO YOUR OWN perspective? - in any event, you're wrong, coulter is considerably more extreme than moore as well
and I don't trust or hold people like that to be credible.
let me explain something to you: where one is on the scale of SOMEONE ELSE'S perspective (remember, you CAN'T compare someone to themselves!) has NOTHING TO DO with their credibility someone's (lack of) credibility is determined by how often what they say can be proved a lie repeat: however "extreme" one is has nothing to do with their credibility determining credibility is asking the questions: "how often is this person wrong? how often is this person lying?" credibility has nothing to do with where one is on the political spectrum and the fact is, regardless of political persuasion, coulter is considerably less credible than moore. in fact, I fail to see how "extreme" moore is at all? what is your definition of "extreme"? "undemocratic"? what views of moore's, in a democracy, can be held as "extreme"? I find nothing he says to be undemocratic in any way contrast with the very extreme and undemocratic coulter: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly - these are all things she has publicly and proudly rallied against! even if your definition of "extreme" isn't "undemocratic", I still fail to see how moore can be considered "extreme" in any way. if you wouldn't mind, how about giving me some examples of how extreme michael moore is (just because I'm beginning to question your "credibility")