James R. McKenzie wrote:
This only rates a "5"?
I too feel that it should have been rated much higher. The unusual images such as these are quite nice to see.
I wish I could run Fractint in XP (Been there tried that, no go) so I could do a 3D transform of the image and see what comes up or "out" as it were. 8-{>
I have seen some Win-XP systems running FractInt produce an image on the monitor that is basically a jumble of pixels. But after it has finished rendering, if the "S" key is pressed to save the image to a directory path, then viewing that image with some graphic editor shows it is not the mess from the screen, and is the correctly formatted fractal graphic.
BTW if anyone does a 1280x1024 of this e-mail me, I'd like a copy.
Try running FractInt at that resolution, then save the image to disk afterwards and see what you get. Sincerely, P.N.L. ------------------------------------------------- http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/PNL_Fractals.html http://www.Nahee.com/Fractals/