March 2007 - Fractint - mailman.xmission.com

Re: Misk
by jackoftradez＠comcast.net 01 Nov '07

01 Nov '07

. Someone asked, so... The fractint PAR for the buddhabrot is: Buddhabrot { reset=2004 type=mandelcloud passes=1 center-mag=-0.300522/-4.44089e-016/0.8079007/1/-90/-1.23373533611470521e-014 params=751 float=y maxiter=751 fillcolor=0 inside=0 outside=summ sound=off colors=200A84<20>oiPqjQslR<3>zsW<25>CB6A95874653442220000400<23>o00q00s00<3>z00<25>C00A00800<3>000<2>554776998BBACCB<18>\ iihjjillk<3>ssr<25>BBA998776<2>221000011<24>0bn0cp0er<3>0ky<25>09B089067<2>021000210<2>863 } The colors were saved out as a map, and referenced in sstools.ini. Thus it is simpler: Buddhabrot_ { reset=2004 type=mandelcloud passes=1 center-mag=-0.300522/-4.44089e-016/0.8079007/1/-90/-1.23373533611470521e-014 params=751 float=y maxiter=751 fillcolor=0 inside=0 outside=summ sound=off } A BASIC script prints out the whole thing as a literal string, but the params and maxiter numbers are variables; a simple loop varies them from 2->751 and prints out all the PAR entries to one file, along with a BAT file which runs fractint and references the entries sequentially. XFRACTINT? I tried it a few years ago when I was investigating linux. It didn't seem to be as fast or as versatile as DOS fractint so I shelved it. I'm still waiting for 64 bit Fractint ... In the mean time, I've finally got ultrafractal to read some of my fractint pars, like for the universe sequences, but I have to hack them up a bit. Maybe I can re-render the U3 viddie in 32 bit color if I can get it right. But I don't know if current systems can be run 24/7/365; they are not as robust as older systems and tend to overheat. I can fix that, but the rendering time should be much quicker since a windows app can take advantage of the full proc capabilities and 32 bit memory addressing, but they actually render slower than fractint. Don't know why that is ... JoTz .

5 5

FractInt for Windows (beta 4) -- open for testing
by Richard 13 Aug '07

13 Aug '07

Welcome to the FractInt Makeover! For those of you on the fractint list that may not have heard, I've been overhauling the FractInt source base to move it out of the 16-bit DOS world. Things have been progressing nicely and I'm now at a point where I think widespread testing would be helpful. Download and install beta 4 of FractInt for Windows: <http://tinyurl.com/26dvd7> I've just resubscribed to the fractint list so you can send bug reports to me or to the list. If you have any doubt, just send any bugs to me. A memory dump file will be produced upon a crash, but that shouldn't be happening anymore :-). This is what I would call "Phase I" of the overhaul. It is a migration of the existing DOS source base to a 32-bit Windows application. The user interface looks and acts like DOS because it is just a port of the DOS ui. A minimal amount of "Windows-ification" has been done, but you'll notice a lack of normal Windows things like a menu bar, context menu, paying attention to the mouse, dialog boxes, etc. The next phase will be to backfill these changes into the X Window System version to make all these features available to xfractint. Once that is tested, the beta will be over and a new release made. Known Issues There is no sound output support. There is no mouse support. Panning and zooming is by keyboard only. Video modes with pixel dimensions other than 4/3 aspect ratio assume non-square pixels. The images all render fine, but they appear stretched or squashed. The choice of resolutions in fractint.cfg reflect this. With debugflag=10000, error messages are reported for disk video mode when: start fractint, pick any disk video mode (e.g. 320x200), let it render, wait for completion, then go to the <v> screen, change 320 to 32, submit it. Without the debugflag settings, FractInt for Windows will most likely crash. This problem is present in the DOS fractint and not a result of the port. There are a few gaps in functionality associated with fractal types that were computed via assembly language, but these were mostly integer versions of some of the more common fractal types. If you encounter this situation a message will be displayed informing you that you should switch to floating-point for a useful image. -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download <http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html> Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>

11 73

<Paddy>Clarification to: "DOS Fractint under Windows Vista/XP?"
by Hal Lane 01 Apr '07

01 Apr '07

######################################################### In my previous email about running DOS Fractint under WinXP I said: > >In WinXP hitting <alt><enter> while in a full screen >session of DOS Fractint puts Fractint 'onto the Task Bar' >and shows *no* small window of the program on the >desktop. This behavior of WinXP is what makes me >think that your setting 'run in window' may be a problem. > >Clicking on 'Fractint' on the Task Bar returns to the >full screen session of Fractint. This description of the behavior of DOS Fractint under WinXP is true when Fractint is displaying an *image*. However, when I use <alt><enter> when Fractint is showing a *text* screen a windowed session of Fractint *does* appear on the Windows XP desktop. When Fractint is calculating or displaying an *image* and you use <alt><enter> and Fractint appears only 'on the Task Bar' it is allocated *no* CPU time. If Fractint's *text* window is calculating a fractal in a 'Disk Video Mode' and you use <alt><enter>, a windowed session of Fractint appears on the Windows XP desktop and it is allocated about 50% of the CPU on my machine as shown by the Task Manager. Fractint calculating a fractal in a 'Disk Video Mode' in the text window updates the progress of the calculation showing, for example: "Status: Writing line 327" - Hal Lane ######################### # hallane(a)earthlink.net <mailto:hallane@earthlink.net> # ######################### >-----Original Message----- >From: Hal Lane [mailto:hallane@earthlink.net] >Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 9:46 AM >To: padski(a)padski.com; philofractal(a)lists.fractalus.com; Fractint_msg >Subject: RE: <Paddy> DOS Fractint under Windows Vista? > > >Paddy Duncan said: >------------------------------ >>Just tried it on Vista. >>Vista says "This system does not support fullscreen mode" >>Tried setting to Win95 compatibility mode, setting 'run in >>window', all with same result...:-( > >Paddy, > Your setting 'run in window' might possibly be a problem in >getting DOS Fractint to run in Vista. I start Fractint set to 'Full >Screen.' To switch between Fractint's full screen session and >a windowed session of Fractint I use the key combination ><alt><enter>. > >In WinXP hitting <alt><enter> while in a full screen >session of DOS Fractint puts Fractint 'onto the Task Bar' >and shows *no* small window of the program on the >desktop. This behavior of WinXP is what makes me >think that your setting 'run in window' may be a problem. > >Clicking on 'Fractint' on the Task Bar returns to the >full screen session of Fractint. > >(Note that under Win98 I can only use <alt><enter> successfully >when Fractint is showing a *text* screen.) > > >Why don't you try a set of adjustments to the .PIF file ('Shortcut >to Fractint' file) that is *known* to work in WinXP? Below is a set >that works in WinXP for me. > >Hopefully Vista will have the same adjustments available to >make to the .PIF ('Shortcut') file. > > >You should first delete and recreate your current >'Shortcut to Fractint' file since my list of changes to the 'Shortcut' >file only list the changes I made away from the original Windows >default settings -- and you have already made several changes >away from the original Windows default settings. > >The following is copied from a previous post to I made to [Philofractal] >and [Fractint]: > >> >>The full list of changes I made to the default Properties >>on the various tabs of the Fractint .pif ('Shortcut') file >>were: >> >> - Idle Sensitivity: Low [Note: I had previously set 'High.' Both work, >> but 'Low' seems to be somewhat faster.] >> - 256 colors >> - full screen >> - emulate Win98 [sic] >> - disable 'termination warning' >> - disable 'Visual themes' >> - disable 'allow screen saver' >> - disable 'background always suspend' >> >>Note: The .pif file is automatically created the first >>time that a DOS program is run. So, >> - run the DOS program in a command shell (in a 'DOS' window), >> Get the DOS window by typing 'cmd' (no quotes) into the: >> Start > Run 'Open' text box and click 'OK'. >> - the DOS program will probably not work, >> - the .pif file will be created, >> - modify the .pif file's Properties (Right Click on the >> .pif file), >> - run the .pif file (which will now run the DOS program >> correctly in Windows XP) > > - Hal Lane > >####################### ># hallane(a)earthlink.net <mailto:hallane@earthlink.net> # >####################### > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Paddy Duncan [mailto:padski@padski.com] >>Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 4:39 AM >>To: philofractal(a)lists.fractalus.com >>Subject: RE: [philofractal] How do YOU run DOS Fractint under Windows XP? >> >>Just tried it on Vista. >>Vista says "This system does not support fullscreen mode" >>Tried setting to Win95 compatibility mode, setting 'run in >>window', all with >>same result...:-( >> >> >> jackoftradez(a)comcast.net wrote: >--------------------------------------------------- >>> BTW, has anyone tried fractint in VISTA yet? I suspect it wont run at >>> all; I hear even some old windows programs dont run. >---------- ######################################################### -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.413 / Virus Database: 268.18.23/740 - Release Date: 3/30/07

3 2

<Doug>DOS Fractint never uses more than 50% of the CPU in WinXP
by Hal Lane 31 Mar '07

31 Mar '07

Hal Lane said: -------------- >> Fractint never uses more than 50% of the Athlon 64 3500+ 2.2GHz >> CPU as shown in the Task Manager -- even when I raised >> the priority of the task to 'Real Time' -- the highest >> setting. The other 50% of the CPU is allocated to the >> System Idle task -- in other words, the CPU does nothing >> 1/2 of the time. :-( > >Doug Stewart said: >----------------- >I think that you have a dual core and you were just using 1 of the >cores. Fractint will be running in a single thread >and as such can only run on 1 of the cores. > >Try running 2 copies of fractint at the same time and see if it goes up >to 100% > This is a clever deduction, but is, unfortunately, not the case here. Intel is the company that makes the dual core CPUs. My CPU is a 32-bit Athlon. Also, I have a Windows program, Prime95, that uses about 93% of the CPU when it runs alone on the computer. It runs at the lowest priority possible. So I'm still at a loss as to how to get WinXP to schedule the use of more of the CPU for DOS Fractint. - Hal Lane ######################### # hallane(a)earthlink.net # ######################### -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.413 / Virus Database: 268.18.23/740 - Release Date: 3/30/07

1 0

RE: <Paddy> DOS Fractint under Windows Vista?
by Hal Lane 31 Mar '07

31 Mar '07

Paddy Duncan said: ------------------------------ >Just tried it on Vista. >Vista says "This system does not support fullscreen mode" >Tried setting to Win95 compatibility mode, setting 'run in >window', all with same result...:-( Paddy, Your setting 'run in window' might possibly be a problem in getting DOS Fractint to run in Vista. I start Fractint set to 'Full Screen.' To switch between Fractint's full screen session and a windowed session of Fractint I use the key combination <alt><enter>. In WinXP hitting <alt><enter> while in a full screen session of DOS Fractint puts Fractint 'onto the Task Bar' and shows *no* small window of the program on the desktop. This behavior of WinXP is what makes me think that your setting 'run in window' may be a problem. Clicking on 'Fractint' on the Task Bar returns to the full screen session of Fractint. (Note that under Win98 I can only use <alt><enter> successfully when Fractint is showing a *text* screen.) Why don't you try a set of adjustments to the .PIF file ('Shortcut to Fractint' file) that is *known* to work in WinXP? Below is a set that works in WinXP for me. Hopefully Vista will have the same adjustments available to make to the .PIF ('Shortcut') file. You should first delete and recreate your current 'Shortcut to Fractint' file since my list of changes to the 'Shortcut' file only list the changes I made away from the original Windows default settings -- and you have already made several changes away from the original Windows default settings. The following is copied from a previous post to I made to [Philofractal] and [Fractint]: > >The full list of changes I made to the default Properties >on the various tabs of the Fractint .pif ('Shortcut') file >were: > > - Idle Sensitivity: Low [Note: I had previously set 'High.' Both work, > but 'Low' seems to be somewhat faster.] > - 256 colors > - full screen > - emulate Win98 [sic] > - disable 'termination warning' > - disable 'Visual themes' > - disable 'allow screen saver' > - disable 'background always suspend' > >Note: The .pif file is automatically created the first >time that a DOS program is run. So, > - run the DOS program in a command shell (in a 'DOS' window), > Get the DOS window by typing 'cmd' (no quotes) into the: > Start > Run 'Open' text box and click 'OK'. > - the DOS program will probably not work, > - the .pif file will be created, > - modify the .pif file's Properties (Right Click on the > .pif file), > - run the .pif file (which will now run the DOS program > correctly in Windows XP) - Hal Lane ####################### # hallane(a)earthlink.net <mailto:hallane@earthlink.net> # ####################### >-----Original Message----- >From: Paddy Duncan [mailto:padski@padski.com] >Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 4:39 AM >To: philofractal(a)lists.fractalus.com >Subject: RE: [philofractal] How do YOU run DOS Fractint under Windows XP? > >Just tried it on Vista. >Vista says "This system does not support fullscreen mode" >Tried setting to Win95 compatibility mode, setting 'run in >window', all with >same result...:-( > > > jackoftradez(a)comcast.net wrote: --------------------------------------------------- >> BTW, has anyone tried fractint in VISTA yet? I suspect it wont run at >> all; I hear even some old windows programs dont run. ---------- -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.413 / Virus Database: 268.18.23/740 - Release Date: 3/30/07

1 0

FOTD 31-03-07 (FOTD for March 31, 2007 [No Rating])
by Jim Muth 30 Mar '07

30 Mar '07

FOTD -- March 31, 2007 (No Rating) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: In today's fractal I mixed Z^2 and Z^(0.1). This combination creates a parent fractal that resembles a Mandelbrot set with its west, north and south sides torn apart. Today's image is located in what remains of the north bud of the M-set. Most of the effect of hazy lavender circles was achieved by calculating the image with the inside set to 'bof60', which colors the inside according to how close the points come to the origin. I did not name or rate the image, since it's more a show of Fractint's program features than a fractal that is worthwhile in its own right. The calculation time of 5-1/3 minutes is a bit slow. A faster way of viewing the image is to go to the FOTD web site at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> and see it there. I have seen comments on the list about the slow-down that happens when Fractint is run under the version of DOS in Windows XP-Pro. Once the slow-down kicks in, the only way I know to defeat it is to baby-sit the machine and strike a key every minute. But I think I have found a way around the problem, which totally avoids the slow-down and lets fractals calculate at top speed to completion without human intervention. I will do a few more tests to see if I am right, then post my findings in a day or two. The Friday weather turned out near perfect here at Fractal Central -- blue skies, light winds and a temperature of 64F 18C. The cats seemed not to notice the perfect weather. They were more concerned with finding trouble to get into. In my department, the big rush, which has been going on for over a month, is almost at its end. And it sure will be good to have things back to normal. The next FOTD will appear in 24 hours. Until then, take care, and a paradox arises when we try to squeeze into our limited concept of reality something that will not fit there. A typical example is the grandfather paradox. Jim Muth jamth(a)mindspring.com jimmuth(a)aol.com START PARAMETER FILE======================================= FOTD_for_Mar_31_07 { ; time=0:05:20.65--SF5 on a P200 reset=2004 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=ident center-mag=-0.96998637854805090/+0.605163364931592\ 80/3203.329/1/-102.5/1.85112133954667968e-011 params=1/0.1/1/2/0/0 float=y maxiter=1500 inside=bof60 logmap=yes periodicity=10 colors=000zezxbzt`vnXrhTmbPhXKcRGZKCUE8PA5051000K0\ 0A000000A0A00K00PP0tN3vI7zECzCIz8Nz7Tz3Zz0bz0hz0oz\ 0tz0vz1vz7xzAxtGxmKzfPz`VzTZzNdzGfz8lz3pz0sz0qz0mz\ 0fz0bz0Xz0Tz0Pz0EzA5tN0mX0fh0`t0Vz0Pz0Tz0Xz0`x0kq0\ nk0pe0rZ0tT0vN0xG3zA7z5Az0Ez0Iz0Gz1GvCErPEm`ChmCcz\ 5cx0cv0ct0cq0co0fm0hm0kf0mb0mX0oT0oN0qI0sC0u80v5Ny\ 0cz0mz5XoCGeK1VT3XN5XI7ZE7ZA8Z5A`1A`0Cb0Eb0Eb0Ge0I\ e0Ie0Zq0oz5zzNzzbzzZzzXzqTzfRzXNzNKzCGz3Ez0Cz0Ez0E\ z0Gx0Gv0It0Iq0Ko0Km0Nk1Nh1Pf1Pe3Rb3R`3Rb7VbAZbC`bG\ ebIfbNkbRobTqbXvbZxbbzbfzbhzbmzbozP`zAPz0Az00z00z0\ 0z00z00z03vACoNNhZXbmfXzqRzzKzzGzzKzzNzzRzzTzzXzzZ\ zz`zzezzfzzkzzmzzqzztzzvzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz\ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz\ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz\ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz\ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END PARAMETER FILE=========================================

2 3

Re: <Lee>"...[pixels] *outside* the lake will have the same color."
by Hal Lane 30 Mar '07

30 Mar '07

######################################################## Lee Skinner wrote: ------------------ >... most of the area outside the lake will have the same >color. Lee, Thanks for the clarification of this detail of the Logmap problem caused by not adjusting or turning it off when zooming out of images that have Logmap set to non-zero values. What you say makes sense. For those of us who enjoy calculating fractals by creating variations on images created by others this has been a very useful discussion. ----------------------------------------------------------- Below is an excerpt from pages 84 & 85 of V20.0 Fractint's FRACTINT.DOC documentation about the use of Logmap. (Create FRACTINT.DOC with the command: FRACTINT.EXE makedoc typed at a command prompt while your default directory is the Fractint directory. FRACTINT.DOC is actually an ASCII text file, so you can rename it to FRACTINT.WRI to get the MS Write text editor to open it -- which is faster than letting MS Word open a .DOC file.) -------------------------------------------------------- Especially note this info about Logmap: "This results in spectacularly different images..." Also note the short, example given in the table towards the end of the excerpt about how a single cycle of the color map colors is redistributed over the entire range of a fractal's iteration values. This example is for the Ranges= parameter, but a remapping of the colors in the color map of a similar nature is done by setting a non-zero Logmap parameter on the <X> page in Fractint. Logmap calculates which iteration value to assign to each color for you, whereas Ranges= allows you to specify the distribution of the color map colors yourself. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- " Fractint Version 20.0 Page 84 . . . 3.7 Logarithmic Palettes and Color Ranges By default, Fractint maps iterations to colors 1:1. I.e. if the calculation for a fractal "escapes" (exceeds the bailout value) after N iterations, the pixel is colored as color number N. If N is greater than the number of colors available, it wraps around. So, if you are using a 16-color video mode, and you are using the default maximum iteration count of 150, your image will run through the 16-color palette 150/16 = 9.375 times. When you use Logarithmic palettes, the entire range of iteration values is compressed to map to one span of the color range. This results in spectacularly different images if you are using a high iteration limit and are zooming in on an area near a "lakelet". When using a compressed palette in a 256 color mode, we suggest changing your colors from the usual defaults. The last few colors in the default IBM VGA color map are black. This results in points nearest the "lake" smearing into a single dark band, with little contrast from the blue (by default) lake. Fractint has a number of types of compressed palette, selected by the "Log Palette" line on the <X> screen, or by the "logmap=" command line parameter: [logmap=0 is 'logmap off' - Hal Lane] logmap=1: for standard logarithmic palette. logmap=-1: "old" logarithmic palette. This variant was the only one used before Fractint 14.0. It differs from logmap=1 in that some colors are not used - logmap=1 "spreads" low color numbers which are unused by logmap=-1's pure logarithmic mapping so that all colors are assigned. logmap=N (>1): Same as logmap=1, but starting from iteration count N. Pixels with iteration counts less than N are mapped to color 1. This is useful when zooming in an area near the lake where no points in the image have low iteration counts - it makes use of the low colors which would otherwise be unused. logmap=-N (<-1): Similar to logmap=N, but uses a square root distribution of the colors instead of a logarithmic one. logmap=2 or -2: Auto calculates the logmap value for maximum effect. Another way to change the 1:1 mapping of iteration counts to colors is to use the "RANGES=" parameter. It has the format: RANGES=aa/bb/cc/dd/... Fractint Version 20.0 Page 85 Iteration counts up to and including the first value are mapped to color number 0, up to and including the second value to color number 1, and so on. The values must be in ascending order. A negative value can be specified for "striping". The negative value specifies a stripe width, the value following it specifies the limit of the striped range. Two alternating colors are used within the striped range. Example: RANGES=0/10/30/-5/65/79/32000 This example maps iteration counts to colors as follows: color iterations ------------------- 0 unused (formula always iterates at least once) 1 1 to 10 2 11 to 30 3 31 to 35, 41 to 45, 51 to 55, and 61 to 65 4 36 to 40, 46 to 50, and 56 to 60 5 66 to 79 6 80 and greater Note that the maximum value in a RANGES parameter is 32767 and [is] the maximum value for the number of iterations [third parameter on the <X> page; maxiter= in .PAR files - Hal Lane] is also 32767 when using RANGES." - Hal Lane ######################### # hallane(a)earthlink.net <mailto:hallane@earthlink.net> # ######################### --------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: Lee H. Skinner [mailto:skinner@thuntek.net] >Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 9:34 AM >To: Fractint and General Fractals Discussion >Cc: Philofractal >Subject: [philofractal] Re: [Fractint] <Charles> Re: ...big stretches >where [there there is] no reason to zoom in... > > >>> If the Logmap value is NOT reset these zoomed out images >>> may apparently have many of their pixels rendered in the >>> 'lake' color -- > >No. Just most of the area outside the lake will have the same >color. Setting logmap to 2 will cause an optimization (it will >change from 2 to a higher number) of the logmap value for the image. >-- ######################################################## -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.413 / Virus Database: 268.18.22/739 - Release Date: 3/29/07

1 0

<Charles> Re: ...big stretches where [there there is] no reason to zoom in...
by Hal Lane 30 Mar '07

30 Mar '07

############################################### Charles Crocker wrote: ---------------------- >When zooming out there may be big stretches where I can >see absolutely no reason to zoom in where he did. Please note the explanation of this being caused by the setting of the Logmap parameter given by Lee Skinner in his March 27th [Fractint] post: Lee Skinner wrote: ------------------ >The easiest way to look at the parent image is to do <Z>, <F6> and set >the Magnification and X-Magnification Factor both to 1, and the Rotation >Angle and Skew Angle both to 0. If Logmap has been used (as in this >case), also go to <X> and set the Log Palette to 2. Anytime you create >a new image with Logmap, you need to reset it. That's why you got 2 >completely blue screens while zooming out. Change your parent image's >Logmap from 45 to 3 [2? - hal lane], and you'll get a much richer >picture. > I have not yet actually done the exercise of zooming out of the same starting image twice -- once leaving Logmap set to a large value and again with Logmap reset back to two. If I understand this phenomenon correctly, the visually pleasing Logmap setting used in a final highly zoomed FOTD image can be inappropriate for images created by zooming back OUT from this FOTD image. If the Logmap value is NOT reset these zoomed out images may apparently have many of their pixels rendered in the 'lake' color -- sometimes creating an entirely black (or blue) screen. I believe that when the Logmap value is set to greater than a value of two, that the mapping of: the 512 colors in the color map to: the final iteration values of pixels is non-linear (actually logarithmic.) This change in assignment of colors by the Logmap parameter can apparently make detail in an image 'disappear' just as using an inappropriate color map for an image can. (An extreme example of an inappropriate color map would be having 75% of the entries in a color map be black. This will almost always hide structure that exists in a fractal colored with this particular color map -- and could easily make the structure of an entire fractal become a black screen.) Thanks for collecting, creating and posting the parm and formula files! Now that I have gotten down off my soap box I look forward to creating their fractals. - Hal Lane ######################### # hallane(a)earthlink.net # ######################### ---------------------------------------------------------- >Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:53:12 -0500 >From: Charles Crocker <chasc(a)pop.gis.net> >Subject: Re: [Fractint] here is another one from yesterdays FOTD >To: Fractint and General Fractals Discussion > >I probably qualify as a deep zoom addict but I haven't gone past a >magnification of 1 to the 128th yet. However there can be some very nice >pictures that appear along the way. BPZo is an example I really like. BPZo >meaning BlackPearl Zoom out. In the past I have been puzzled by >some of Jim >MUth's examples. When zooming out there may be big stretches where I can >see absolutely no reason to zoom in where he did. > >Thanks to Ton Koppens and Lee Skinner I now have formulas to match all the >parameter files that I now have. During my organizing I ran across Julia1 >that I thought was an interesting plain Julia with fancy coloring. In the >process I ran the evolver on it to see what happened and got a completely >unexpected result. Juliaev1 after applying it once and Juliaev2 after the >second application. They meet the self similar test completely. Magnifying >an area on the edge of Juliaev1 it appears identical as far as I went. I >quit after four maximum zooms into the arbitrary precision range. The >calculating slows down radically and what reason is there to go >any further >if there is nothing new? > >There is a Julia set in the neighborhood of this one that is an almost >exact replica of the Playboy rabbit. And this one really multiplies like >rabbits are supposed to. I'll post it when I find it. > >One more note. It seems that there is always something new to learn about >Fractint. The description of F6 on the Z screen says it switches to corner >parameters. That's the last thing I want to do so I never even considered >looking at it. > >Charles > > >julia1 { > ; Fractint Version 2004 Patchlevel 4 > reset=2004 type=julia center-mag=-1.5e-007/-2.5e-008/0.6666667 > params=0.26/0.55 inside=bof61 > >colors=00000e0e00eee00e0eeL0eeeLLLLLzLzLLzzzLLzLzzzLzzz000555<3>HHHKKKOO\ >O<3>ccchhhmmmssszzz00z<3>z0z<3>z00<3>zz0<3>0z0<3>0zz<2>0GzVVz<3>zVz<3>zV\ >V<3>zzV<3>VzV<3>Vzz<2>Vbzhhz<3>zhz<3>zhh<3>zzh<3>hzh<3>hzz<2>hlz00S<3>S0\ >S<3>S00<3>SS0<3>0S0<3>0SS<2>07SEES<3>SES<3>SEE<3>SSE<3>ESE<3>ESS<2>EHSKK\ >S<2>QKSSKSSKQSKOSKMSKK<2>SQKSSKQSKOSKMSKKSK<2>KSQKSSKQSKOSKMS00G<3>G0G<3\ >>G00<3>GG0<3>0G0<3>0GG<2>04G88G<2>E8GG8GG8EG8CG8AG88<2>GE8GG8EG8CG8AG88G\ >8<2>8GE8GG8EG8CG8AGBBG<2>FBGGBGGBFGBDGBCGBB<2>GFBGGBFGBDGBCGBBGB<2>BGFBG\ > GBFGBDGBCG000<6>000 > } > >juliaev2 { > ; Fractint Version 2004 Patchlevel 4 > reset=2004 type=julia passes=1 > center-mag=-1.5e-007/-2.5e-008/0.9861933 > params=-0.8591238135929441/-0.05492782372508923 float=y maxiter=2047 > inside=fmod outside=0 > >colors=000000<24>mGOoGPqHQ<3>zKU<25>C46A45834<2>211000000<9>000000000<2>\ >000010030<23>0n00p00r0<3>0z0<25>0C00A0080<2>020000000<9>000000000<2>0001\ > 10330<23>nn0pp0rr0<3>zz0<25>CC0AA0880<2>220000000<29>000 > } > >juliaev1 { > ; Fractint Version 2004 Patchlevel 4 > reset=2004 type=julia center-mag=-1.5e-007/-2.5e-008/0.9861933 > params=-0.1164558854945524/0.01938474684896393 float=y maxiter=511 > inside=fmod outside=0 > >colors=000000<24>mGOoGPqHQ<3>zKU<25>C46A45834<2>211000000<9>000000000<2>\ >000010030<23>0n00p00r0<3>0z0<25>0C00A0080<2>020000000<9>000000000<2>0001\ > 10330<23>nn0pp0rr0<3>zz0<25>CC0AA0880<2>220000000<29>000 > } > >BPZo { > ; Fractint Version 2004 Patchlevel 4 > reset=2004 type=formula formulaname=mandelbrotmix4 >function=ident passes=1 > >center-mag=+0.30598232092337500/-2.47436852042129000/135634.9/0.9299/-16\ > 2.852356708459325/0.732210256330880105 params=1/-2/6/-1/0/0 float=y > maxiter=16000 inside=maxiter outside=summ periodicity=10 > >colors=000VSC<3>OGHMDIKAJMAKOAM000UGLXIL_LK<3>kWInZIqaH<2>ziF<4>jWEgUEdR\ >D<3>TGDQEDNBCK8C413000<3>EFAIIDLLG<4>ccWgfZkja<3>zyn<9>e`UcZSaWQ<3>UMH00\ >000000053M<4>5Dc5Ff5Hj<3>5Px<3>5hc5mZ5rU5wP<4>5Zm5Ur5Px<3>5Ed5B`58W56R53\ >M000000000b`c<4>lornru<9>YWPWUMVRI<3>OI5<3>YRD`TFbWH<3>kcPneRpgT<3>zpa<4\ >>jdWgaVcZT<3>ROPOLOKJN<2>AAK000000A3M<5>O9dQAgSBj<3>`Fw<3>J_cEdZAjU5oP5j\ >N0004aK<3>2JE2EC1AB159007000000000A00<4>O00Q00T00<3>c00<10>L00J00H00<3>A\ > 00000000UDG<4>h_9kc7nh6<3>zz0<7>``9YYAWVB > } >------------------------------ > ############################################### -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.413 / Virus Database: 268.18.22/739 - Release Date: 3/29/07

2 1

FOTD 28-03-07 (FOTD for March 28, 2007 [No Rating])
by Jim Muth 29 Mar '07

29 Mar '07

FOTD -- March 29, 2007 (No Rating) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: The formula behind today's image combines 5 negative parts of Z^(-1.1) with 0.1 negative part of Z^(-11.1) and adds (1/C), resulting in an oversized parent fractal consisting of 4 large bays and a very prominent 'fan', the whole thing surrounded by cut-off rings of various shapes and sizes. Today's image lies in a field of debris just east of the 'fan'. I gave the image no name or rating. Due to the winding-down but still pressing rush, I gave the image too little time and effort to honor it with a name. I might have rated it at a 4 or 5, but decided to let it go un-rated. The calculation time of 3-1/2 minutes means that little time will have been wasted if the image disappoints. And almost no time will have been wasted if the image is viewed on the FOTD web site at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> In a few days I will discuss the use of the MandelbrotMix4 formula, paying special attention to the method I use to find good parameters to enter into it. But to begin the discussion right now, I might re-phrase the question into something like, "how do I recognize a good parent fractal when I see one?" A cooler but still mild day with a temperature of 59F 15C here at Fractal Central on Wednesday went un-appreciated by the fractal cats. They were more interested in watching the local squirrels make more squirrels. In my department the work is almost back to the normal amount. One or two more days should just about do it. The next FOTD will appear in 24 hours. Until then, take care, and be of sound mind and body, but don't make too much noise while you're doing it. Jim Muth jamth(a)mindspring.com jimmuth(a)aol.com START PARAMETER FILE======================================= FOTD_for_Mar_29_07 { ; time=0:03:32.45--SF5 on a P200 reset=2004 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=1 center-mag=+7.81582291647887900/+0.263607712474751\ 30/249.6664/1/25/1.13533467349657968e-010 params=-5/-1.1/-0.1/-11.1/0/0 float=y maxiter=750 inside=0 logmap=49 periodicity=10 colors=000WLuZJv`GyZIxYJxWLxVMxTNxSPxQQxPSxNTxMUxK\ VxJXxIUxHVuGUrFQoERlDMiCJfBHdAFa9CZ8AW78T65Q03N01L\ 04IA6FA8CIA9SC6WE3_G1cL4hP7mT9rXCv`EzeHziKzmMzqPzu\ RztUztczzmzzzzzzzzmztcztUvtTqjPlaLgTIbKEZBBRI8JP6B\ W44z25z66zA7zE8zH8zL9zPAzSBvWCr_CmbDhcEccFZdFUdGPd\ HKeIFeIAfJ8fK9fL9gLAgMAhNBhNBhMCeMDbME`LEYLFVLGTKH\ QKHNzzLJJIzzFJKDzzAIM7zz5vz9rzCmzFhzIczLZzOHjRKfWM\ b_OZcRVgTRkVNoXJsVNqURpTUoSYmRalQdkPbjPajP`iP_iPZh\ PYhPXhPWgPVgPUfPTfPSePRePQeELwDMtDMqDNnDNkDOhDOeCP\ bCP_CQXCQUCRRCROCRLDSODSRETUETXFU_FUbGVeGVhHWkHWnJ\ XmLXmMXlOYlPYkRYkTZjUZjWZiX_iZ_h__ha`db`ac`YeaVfaR\ gaOhaLgeHghDPVV6Hl7Km8Nn9QoATpAWpBZqCarDdsEgtEjtFm\ uGpvHswHuwKvxNwyPxzSyzVzzXzz_zzbzzdzzgzzizzjzzjzzj\ zzjzzkzzkzzkzzkzzkzzhzzfzzczzazzZzzXzzUzzSzzPzzNzz\ LzzJzzHzzFzzDzzBzz9zz7zz5zz4zz9zzDzzHzzLzzPzzIzzGz\ zEzzCzzFzzIzzLzzOzzQzzTzz } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END PARAMETER FILE=========================================

3 2

FOTD 30-03-07 (FOTD for March 30, 2007 [No Rating])
by Jim Muth 29 Mar '07

29 Mar '07

FOTD -- March 30, 2007 (No Rating) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: Today's image is based on a formula that plays a game with the golden ratio. I calculated the formula Z^(1.618)+C at a level 32 turns up the logarithmic ladder, and got a parent fractal that somewhat resembles a Mister Potato-Head. There's not much more to be said about the near-shapeless blob. But this blob has a good bit of debris scattered around its west side, and this debris holds midgets, one of which appears as the featured element in today's image. Once again, my limited time permitted only a short trip to Fractal Land, so I could not name or rate today's image. But I will say that it is a bit more interesting than the usual images found in the Mandeloids of an order between 1 and 2. The render time of a brief 2-2/3 minutes will try the patience of no one, and it makes the task of running the included parameter file almost a breeze. An even swifter way to see the image is to go to the FOTD web site at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> and view it there. A cloudless sky and a temperature of 55F 13C made conditions near perfect here at Fractal Central on Thursday. The fractal cats must have agreed, for they somehow managed to get through the entire day without getting into trouble. With me, the rush is near its end, and more relaxing days are in sight. With more time to devote to them, the fractals will be improving in the near future. (This is assuming they are not already perfect.) Regardless of the perfection or lack thereof, the next FOTD will appear here in 24 hours. Until then, take care, and seek sub- limeness in your fractals. Jim Muth jamth(a)mindspring.com jimmuth(a)aol.com START PARAMETER FILE======================================= FOTD_for_Mar_30_07 { ; time=0:02:41.05--SF5 on a P200 reset=2004 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotBC2 center-mag=-0.35953404841607610/-0.056778379676581\ 14/5.911021e+007/1/-65/1.55103769647335632e-007 params=1.618/0/32/0 float=y maxiter=1500 inside=0 logmap=106 periodicity=10 colors=000DT9GiDJdHN_LQVPTQSZUYcYciaineosiuqnv_X`R\ QRHKH8E7BJAENCHREJVGL`NNeTPk_RpeWma`kYdhUifQncMraJ\ aaZLamGRaBHQCMMDQJEUGFYDGb9Hf6Ij3In0OhAUcK_YUeTceV\ adW_dYYd_WdaTdbRddPdfNdgLf`FhV9iP4cO9YODSOHMOMGOQA\ OUG`YMmaRyeYvadsYjqUkoVlmWmlXnjYohZogZpe_qc`rbas`b\ tZctYcoOfjEif4leCfdJacRXbYSadN`eM_eLZfLYfKXgJWgJVh\ IUhHTiHSiGSiGRhKRgORgRRfVReZReaQb_P`ZOZXNXWMVULTTL\ QRKOQJMOIKNHILGGKGEJOBLW9Mb7Oj5Pr3Ry1SxBexKsrAasCc\ sEesFgtHitIktKmtLopJnlImhGleFkaDjYCjUAiR9hN7gJ6fG5\ fC5Z85S45K05D4AI8EMCJQFNVJSZNWbQ_fTYhWWiZUkaSldRmg\ PojNpmLrpJssItpMrnPplSnjVlhYkf`iddgbge`jdZmbXp`VsZ\ TvYRuVPtTOsRMrOKqMJqKHpIFoFEnDCmBBm9CjFChKDeQDcVDa\ _EZeEXjEVoRQgbM`nITzEMvGNsIOoKPlLQiNRePSbQT_SUWUVT\ WWQXXMZYJ`ZGa_H`aH_cIZdIZfJYhJXiKXkKWlKVnLVpLUqMTs\ MTuNSvNRxNRyTQqYQibQagPUlPMqPFkQIeQK_QMUQPOQRIQTCQ\ W6QY1Q_3O`5MaUgFNkBGo89s5 } frm:MandelbrotBC2 { ; by several Fractint users e=p1, a=imag(p2)+100, p=real(p2)+PI q=2*PI*floor(p/(2*PI)), r=real(p2)-q Z=C=Pixel: Z=log(Z) IF(imag(Z)>r) Z=Z+flip(2*PI) ENDIF Z=exp(e*(Z+flip(q)))+C |Z|<a } END PARAMETER FILE=========================================

1 0