Tim, Most list software does seem to "recommend" replies going to the sender and not back to the list. I always thought that was a funny position... it sort of acts to squelch discussion. Sometimes people post replies to the list that they meant to be private (everyone who's done that, please raise your hand) but those usually aren't too serious. The more serious, the less likely the act will be repeated. :) I think the mistakes are worth the improved discussion flow. I think it's much, much better if the e-mail addresses in the archives are not available to harvesters. Big, centralized list servers are attractive targets for harvesters, and we know Xmission's are scanned. I already get spam at a sustained rate of 50-100 per day; while I have taken steps to deal with the torrent, not everyone has the same options I do. For the lists that I manage, I have messages from non-senders sent to me for approval. Every once in a while these messages are spam, but the list software I use filters out messages which aren't To: the list, and that takes care of almost all the spam. If you're getting fifty spams in just a few days, I think it's reasonable to just turn off the forwarding, and have list members contact you if they're having trouble posting. --Damien
Damien wrote:
I always thought that was a funny position... it sort of acts to squelch discussion.
My thoughts exactly.
I think it's much, much better if the e-mail addresses in the archives are not available to harvesters.
I just changed this, we'll see how it looks when this is posted.
For the lists that I manage, I have messages from non-senders sent to me for approval.
This won't work for me because of spam sent to the list.
If you're getting fifty spams in just a few days, I think it's reasonable to just turn off the forwarding, and have list members contact you if they're having trouble posting.
Good, because I no longer have any knowledge of posts from non members! This makes running the list very easy. I'll alert members from time to time to email me if they have posting problems. The usual problem is the size limit on posts. Tim
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 05:13 pm, fractdev@mailman.xmission.com wrote:
I think it's much, much better if the e-mail addresses in the archives are not available to harvesters.
I just changed this, we'll see how it looks when this is posted.
I sometimes have to go back through the messages to find one sent by a specific person. Like some from you, Tim. This setting makes that difficult. And, if for some reason a person forgets to put their name in the body of the message, it's even more difficult. The message source does say it is from Tim, but I'm not sure how it got there. Jonathan
Jonathan wrote:
I sometimes have to go back through the messages to find one sent by a specific person.
The option didn't work the way I wanted, it made the list completely anonymous. I just want to hide the emails. It must be possible, I'll ask - just haven't found the right option. Tim
participants (4)
-
dmj@fractalus.com -
fractdev@mailman.xmission.com -
Jonathan Osuch -
Tim Wegner