Hmmmm That's _very_ strange. If you can, please sendme both files (before and aftr indent) and I'll take a look at the code generated. I agree with Tim that it is not likely aindent failure, but let's check it out. []'s HB
-----Mensaje original----- De: fractdev-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:fractdev-admin@mailman.xmission.com]En nombre de Jonathan Osuch Enviado el: Jueves, 20 de Diciembre de 2001 21:25 Para: fractdev@mailman.xmission.com Asunto: Re: [Fractdev] Xfractint compiler optimizations
Humberto,
I may be completely off the mark here, but some optimizations involve code unrolling and duplication so this could be the case for the object size. And I assume you're talking about the stripped binary in both cases.
The optimizations were the same in both cases. But, I didn't do anything with the binaries, so maybe that's the problem.
And by the way why are you worried about the code size increase in xfractint?
I'm only worried about the size increase because it may indicate a change in the logic of the code run through indent.
Jonathan
_______________________________________________ Fractdev mailing list Fractdev@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fractdev